Friday, December 29, 2017

She Broke Japan’s Silence on Rape

Shiori Ito told the police she had been raped by Noriyuki Yamaguchi, then the Washington bureau chief for the Tokyo Broadcasting System and a biographer of Prime Minister Shinzo Abe.

TOKYO — It was a spring Friday night when one of Japan’s best-known television journalists invited Shiori Ito out for a drink. Her internship at a news service in Tokyo was ending, and she had inquired about another internship with his network.
They met at a bar in central Tokyo for grilled chicken and beer, then went to dinner. The last thing she remembers, she later told the police, was feeling dizzy and excusing herself to go to the restroom, where she passed out.
By the end of the night, she alleged, he had taken her back to his hotel room and raped her while she was unconscious.
The journalist, Noriyuki Yamaguchi, the Washington bureau chief of the Tokyo Broadcasting System at the time and a biographer of Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, denied the charge and, after a two-month investigation, prosecutors dropped the case.
Then Ms. Ito decided to do something women in Japan almost never do: She spoke out.
In a news conference in May and a book published in October, she said the police had obtained hotel security camera footage that appeared to show Mr. Yamaguchi propping her up, unconscious, as they walked through the hotel lobby. The police also located and interviewed their taxi driver, who confirmed that she had passed out. Investigators told her they were going to arrest Mr. Yamaguchi, she said — but then suddenly backed off.
Elsewhere, her allegations might have caused an uproar. But here in Japan, they attracted only a smattering of attention.
Continue reading the main story
As the United States reckons with an outpouring of sexual misconduct cases that have shaken Capitol HillHollywoodSilicon Valley and the news media, Ms. Ito’s story is a stark example of how sexual assault remains a subject to be avoided in Japan, where few women report rape to the police and when they do, their complaints rarely result in arrests or prosecution.
On paper, Japan boasts relatively low rates of sexual assault. In a survey conducted by the Cabinet Office of the central government in 2014, one in 15 women reported experiencing rape at some time in their lives, compared with one in five women who report having been raped in the United States.
But scholars say Japanese women are far less likely to describe nonconsensual sex as rape than women in the West. Japan’s rape laws make no mention of consent, date rape is essentially a foreign concept and education about sexual violence is minimal.
Instead, rape is often depicted in manga comics and pornography as an extension of sexual gratification, in a culture in which such material is often an important channel of sex education.
The police and courts tend to define rape narrowly, generally pursuing cases only when there are signs of both physical force and self-defense and discouraging complaints when either the assailant or victim has been drinking.
Last month, prosecutors in Yokohama dropped a case against six university students accused of sexually assaulting another student after forcing her to drink alcohol.
And even when rapists are prosecuted and convicted in Japan, they sometimes serve no prison time; about one in 10 receive only suspended sentences, according to Justice Ministry statistics.
This year, for example, two students at Chiba University near Tokyo convicted in the gang rape of an intoxicated woman were released with suspended sentences, though other defendants were sentenced to prison. Last fall, a Tokyo University student convicted in another group sexual assault was also given a suspended sentence.
“It’s quite recent that activists started to raise the ‘No Means No’ campaign,” said Mari Miura, a professor of political science at Sophia University in Tokyo. “So I think Japanese men get the benefit from this lack of consciousness about the meaning of consent.”
Of the women who reported experiencing rape in the Cabinet Office survey, more than two-thirds said they had never told anyone, not even a friend or family member. And barely 4 percent said they had gone to the police. By contrast, in the United States, about a third of rapes are reported to the police, according to the Bureau of Justice Statistics.
“Prejudice against women is deep-rooted and severe, and people don’t consider the damage from sexual crimes seriously at all,” said Tomoe Yatagawa, a lecturer in gender law at Waseda University.
Ms. Ito, 28, who has filed a civil suit against Mr. Yamaguchi, agreed to discuss her case in detail to highlight the challenges faced by women who suffer sexual violence in Japan.
“I know if I didn’t talk about it, this horrible climate of sexual assault will never change,” she said.
Mr. Yamaguchi, 51, also agreed to speak for this article. He denied committing rape. “There was no sexual assault,” he said. “There was no criminal activity that night.”
A taxi outside the Sheraton Miyako Hotel in Tokyo. The police interviewed a taxi driver who said he had taken Ms. Ito and Mr. Yamaguchi to a hotel, although the woman had asked to be taken to a train station.

‘Not a Chance’

Ms. Ito had met Mr. Yamaguchi twice while studying journalism in New York before their encounter on April 3, 2015.
When she contacted him again in Tokyo, he suggested that he might be able to help her find a job in his bureau, she said. He invited her for drinks and then dinner at Kiichi, a sushi restaurant in the trendy Ebisu neighborhood.
To her surprise, they dined alone, following beer with sake. At some point, she felt dizzy, went to the bathroom, laid her head on the toilet tank and blacked out, she said.
When she woke, Ms. Ito said, she was underneath Mr. Yamaguchi in his hotel bed, naked and in pain.
Japanese law describes the crime of “quasi-rape” as sexual intercourse with a woman by “taking advantage of loss of consciousness or inability to resist.” In the United States, the law varies from state to state, with some defining the same crime as second-degree rape or sexual assault.
The police later located a taxi driver who recalled picking up Ms. Ito and Mr. Yamaguchi and taking them to the nearby Sheraton Miyako Hotel, where Mr. Yamaguchi was staying.
The driver said Ms. Ito was conscious at first and asked to be taken to a subway station, according to a transcript of an interview with the driver. Mr. Yamaguchi, however, instructed him to take them to his hotel.
The driver recalled Mr. Yamaguchi saying that they had more work to discuss. He also said Mr. Yamaguchi might have said something like, “I won’t do anything.”
When they pulled up to the hotel, the driver said, Ms. Ito had “gone silent” for about five minutes and he discovered that she had vomited in the back seat.
“The man tried to move her over toward the door, but she did not move,” the driver said, according to the transcript. “So he got off first and put his bags on the ground, and he slid his shoulder under her arm and tried to pull her out of the car. It looked to me like she was unable to walk on her own.”
Ms. Ito also appears incapacitated in hotel security camera footage obtained by the police. In pictures from the footage seen by The New York Times, Mr. Yamaguchi is propping her up as they move through the lobby around 11:20 p.m.
Ms. Ito said it was about 5 a.m. when she woke up. She said she wriggled out from under Mr. Yamaguchi and ran to the bathroom. When she came out, she said, “he tried to push me down to the bed and he’s a man and he was quite strong and he pushed me down and I yelled at him.”
She said she demanded to know what had happened and whether he had used a condom. He told her to calm down, she said, and offered to buy her a morning-after pill.
Instead, she got dressed and fled the hotel.
Ms. Ito believes she was drugged, she said, but there is no evidence to support her suspicion.
Mr. Yamaguchi said she had simply drunk too much. “At the restaurant, she drank so quickly, and in fact I asked her, ‘Are you all right?’” he said. “But she said, ‘I’m quite strong and I’m thirsty.’”
He said: “She’s not a child. If she could have controlled herself, then nothing would have happened.”
Mr. Yamaguchi said he had brought her to his hotel because he was worried that she would not make it home. He had to rush back to his room, he said, to meet a deadline in Washington.
Mr. Yamaguchi acknowledged that “it was inappropriate” to take Ms. Ito to his room but said, “It would have been inappropriate to leave her at the station or in the hotel lobby.”
He declined to describe what happened next, citing the advice of his lawyers. But in court documents filed in response to Ms. Ito’s civil suit, he said he undressed her to clean her up and laid her on one of the beds in his room. Later, he added, she woke and knelt by his bed to apologize.
Mr. Yamaguchi said in the documents that he urged her to return to bed, then sat on her bed and initiated sex. He said she was conscious and did not protest or resist.
But in emails that he exchanged with Ms. Ito after that night, he presented a slightly different account, writing that she had climbed into his bed.
“So it’s not the truth at all that I had sex with you while you were unconscious,” he said in a message on April 18, 2015. “I was quite drunk and an attractive woman like you came into my bed half naked, and we ended up like that. I think we both should examine ourselves.”
In another email, Mr. Yamaguchi denied Ms. Ito’s allegation of rape and suggested that they consult lawyers. “Even if you insist it was quasi-rape, there is not a chance that you can win,” he wrote.
When asked about the emails, Mr. Yamaguchi said a full record of his conversations and correspondence with Ms. Ito would demonstrate that he had “had no intention” of using his position to seduce her.
“I am the one who was caused trouble by her,” he added.
“I have not done anything illegal,” Mr. Yamaguchi said. “There was no sexual assault. There was no criminal activity that night.”

Shame and Hesitation

Ms. Ito said she rushed home to wash after leaving the hotel. She now regards that as a mistake. “I should have just gone to the police,” she said.
Her hesitation is typical. Many Japanese women who have been assaulted “blame themselves, saying, ‘Oh, it’s probably my fault,’” said Tamie Kaino, a professor emeritus of gender studies at Ochanomizu University.
Hisako Tanabe, a rape counselor at the Sexual Assault Relief Center in Tokyo, said that even women who call their hotline and are advised to go to the police often refuse, because they do not expect the police to believe them.
“They think they will be told they did something wrong,” she said.
Ms. Ito said she felt ashamed and considered keeping quiet too, wondering if tolerating such treatment was necessary to succeed in Japan’s male-dominated media industry. But she decided to go to the police five days after the encounter.
“If I don’t face the truth,” she recalled thinking, “I think I won’t be able to work as a journalist.”
The police officers she spoke to initially discouraged her from filing a complaint and expressed doubt about her story because she was not crying as she told it, she said. Some added that Mr. Yamaguchi’s status would make it difficult for her to pursue the case, she said.
But Ms. Ito said the police eventually took her seriously after she urged them to view the hotel security footage.
A two-month investigation followed, after which the lead detective called her in Berlin, where she was working on a freelance project, she said. He told her they were preparing to arrest Mr. Yamaguchi on the strength of the taxi driver’s testimony, the hotel security video and tests that found his DNA on one of her bras.
The detective said Mr. Yamaguchi would be apprehended at the airport on June 8, 2015, after arriving in Tokyo on a flight from Washington, and he asked her to return to Japan to help with questioning, Ms. Ito said.
When that day came, though, the investigator called again. He told her that he was inside the airport but that a superior had just called him and ordered him not to make the arrest, Ms. Ito said.
“I asked him, ‘How is that possible?’” she said. “But he couldn’t answer my question.”
Ms. Ito declined to identify the investigator, saying she wanted to protect him. The Tokyo Metropolitan Police would not comment on whether plans to arrest Mr. Yamaguchi were scuttled. “We have conducted a necessary investigation in light of all laws and sent all documents and evidence to the Tokyo Prosecutors’ office,” a spokesman said.
The Sheraton Miyako Hotel in the Ebisu neighborhood of Tokyo.

‘I Have to Be Strong’

In 2016, the most recent year for which government statistics are available, the police confirmed 989 cases of rape in Japan, or about 1.5 cases for every 100,000 women. By comparison, there were 114,730 cases of rape in the United States, according to F.B.I. statistics, or about 41 cases per 100,000 residents, both male and female.
Scholars say the disparity is less about actual crime rates than a reflection of underreporting by victims and the attitudes of the police and prosecutors in Japan.
Over the summer, Parliament passed the first changes to Japan’s sex crime laws in 110 years, expanding the definition of rape to include oral and anal sex and including men as potential victims. Lawmakers also lengthened minimum sentences. But the law still does not mention consent, and judges can still suspend sentences.
And despite the recent cases, there is still little education about sexual violence at universities. At Chiba, a course for new students refers to the recent gang rape as an “unfortunate case” and only vaguely urges students not to commit crimes.
In Ms. Ito’s case, there is also a question of whether Mr. Yamaguchi received favorable treatment because of his connection to the prime minister.
Not long after Ms. Ito went public with her allegations, a Japanese journalist, Atsushi Tanaka, confronted a top Tokyo police official about the case.
The official, Itaru Nakamura, a former aide to Mr. Abe’s chief cabinet secretary, confirmed that investigators were prepared to arrest Mr. Yamaguchi — and that he had stopped them, Mr. Tanaka reported in Shukan Shincho, a weekly newsmagazine.
The allegations did not affect Mr. Yamaguchi’s position at the Tokyo Broadcasting System, but he resigned last year under pressure from the network after publishing an article that was seen as contentious. He continues to work as a freelance journalist in Japan.
Ms. Ito published a book about her experience in October. It has received only modest attention in Japan’s mainstream news media.
Isoko Mochizuki, one of the few journalists to investigate Ms. Ito’s allegations, said she faced resistance from male colleagues in her newsroom, some of whom dismissed the story because Ms. Ito had not gone to the hospital immediately.
“The press never covers sexual assault very much,” she said.
Ms. Ito said that was precisely why she wanted to speak out.
“I still feel like I have to be strong,” she said, “and just keep talking about why this is not O.K.”

Saturday, October 28, 2017

Loob Holding and Tealive Don’t Want You To Read This Story

On February 23, we chanced upon an unassuming blog post written on Burgielaw.com titled “Bubble Tea War (CHATIME v TEALIVE): La Kaffa’s Version. In it were detailed accounts of La Kaffa’s side of the story in the tea-off between La Kaffa and Loob Holding regarding the termination of Chatime. The report was eye-opening and contained damning facts that were not known to the public beforehand.

A few days later, the article disappeared. 

Much has been reported over here in Malaysia in relation to the tiff between the two companies and the result, at least in the public eye, was that Bryan Loo and his team were blindsided by the letter of termination and were victims of an oppressive La Kaffa. Their Taiwanese franchisors were painted as the ‘Big Brother’ figure bullying the weak and Loob Holding playing the scrappy underdogs forced to ‘kow tow’ to their masters. Having read Burgielaw’s work thoroughly we’re convinced that there’s more to this story.

Bryan Loo’s ‘Victim’ Rhetoric

The Star first reported on January 6 that Loob Holding was seeking legal advice after La Kaffa International, the master franchisor of Chatime had terminated its franchise agreement with Loob Holding. Malaysians were shocked by this ‘sudden’ decision and Loob Holding released a press statement on Saturday stating that they were “…very much concerned over what will happen to these 1000 over workers and their dependents.” He then said that they would lodge a police report against La Kaffa’s “…sudden termination and (would) let the authorities take the necessary action against the law.”

The media ran with the story, highlighting the 1000 workers’ plight and the headlines ran wild with outlets like the NST stating “1,000 Chatime workers in Limbo as franchise’s fate thrown into doubt”. On February 3, La Kaffa released a statement accusing Loob Holding of “(Using) raw materials that were not part of the approved recipe.” To this, Bryan Loo stated on behalf of Loob Holding, “We vehemently deny all the false and malicious allegations set out in La Kaffa’s media statement issued on Feb 3.”

On February 17, The Star reported that all 161 Chatime outlets would be officially transformed to Tealive. The transformation came at a velocity that would put Usain Bolt to shame. The Tealive brand leaned in hard on the weak versus the strong rhetoric, so much so that it’s even emblazoned on their cups, “Never fear the strong. Especially strong tea”. The point was further pushed home in this poster.
“Over the past month, we have worked tirelessly to make right what we feel was wrong. To start over. To build from nothing.” Extremely impressive for a month’s worth of work. Their outlets even carry the same menu with the same exact taste as before (more or less, any experts want to weigh in on the difference?). A fairy tale ending of little David beating Goliath at his own game. Sticking it to the man. Right? 

La Kaffa’s Side (The Unauthorised Raw Materials)

For this, we must rely on the documents that were acquired by Burgielaw.com's now deleted page. La Kaffa’s tale actually begins in January 2016, one year before:

According to the affidavit sent in by La Kaffa, they had suspected something was amiss when the order of raw materials dropped despite an increase in revenue in Loob Holding. The allegations were specific in relating to milk tea powder, cocoa powder, and polypropylene (PP) cups. When no explanation was given by Loob Holding, La Kaffa sent an undercover representative to various outlets in Malaysia to obtain evidence. The result was video evidence that showed the local Chatime outlets were using unapproved cups that lacked the “YM-500” or “YM-700” markings on the base of the cups that proved its authenticity. La Kaffa then sent various letters notifying Loob Holding of the breach, which you can read below:



Letter dated 12th May 2016
Letter dated 2nd August 2016
E-mail dated 3rd August 2016
Because we know what a pain it is to read letters off the screen of your phone, here are the footnotes to the letters, in order: 

First Letter
  1. La Kaffa asserts that Loob Holding has entered into a Regional Exclusive Representation Agreement (RERA).
  2. According to Article 7 of this agreement, Loob Holding can only purchase raw materials from La Kaffa.
  3. La Kaffa questions the purchase of raw materials in particular: milk tea powder, cocoa powder, and PP cups in 2015.
  4. La Kaffa instructs Loob Holding to justify the purchase quantity issue, failure of which will result in a USD10,000 (RM44,500) penalty and instructs them to stop purchasing raw materials from other channels immediately.
Second Letter
  1. Loob Holding did not respond to the letter and the second letter was sent out by La Kaffa’s corporate counsel.
  2. The letter reasserts the first letter’s requests and adds further requests.
  3. La Kaffa had requested for an audit of the books on 1st June 2016 that Loob Holding did not reply.
  4. La Kaffa questions the lack of a convincing reason by Loob Holding.
  5. La Kaffa provided video evidence that 25 STORES under Loob Holding’s control did not use raw materials provided by La Kaffa and a penalty of USD250,000 (RM1.1 mil) was imposed.
The e-mail is a restatement of the second letter in e-mail form.

Now that we've read all that La Kaffa has to say regarding the alleged breaches of contract, we have an e-mail reply submitted by La Kaffa as evidence. Proving that Loob Holdings indeed used unauthorised raw materials. 
Again, here are the footnotes of Loob Holding's response to La Kaffa: 
  1. Loob contends that the prices of raw materials had risen by 20 – 30% blaming it on the exchange rate for USD-MYR.
  2. Loob requests La Kaffa to allow them to procure raw materials from local sources citing their relationship of six years.
  3. Loob contends that the cost of business has also increased significantly over the “past few years”.
  4. They end the letter saying that it was “inevitable” that key components would require local sourcing, admitting the breach in contract.

La Kaffa's Allegations Against Loob Holding

1. Inability to justify the purchase of unauthorized raw materials (Article 7 of RERA)

… it was inevitable that some of the key components will require local source from the readily available market in light of the competitive business environment”

Article 7 of RERA is reproduced here, found and highlighted in red 

2. Denying an audit by La Kaffa (Article 10(iv) of RERA)

Article 10 of RERA is reproduced here and highlighted in red
“The FRANCHISOR shall have the right to inspect and/or audit the MASTER FRANCHISEE’s accounts, books, records, tax returns, inventory stock, data of product-mix”.

3. Outstanding royalty payment 

The outstanding sum under RERA was USD713,273.72 (RM3.2 mil) which was also the subject matter of the arbitration filed by La Kaffa in the Singapore International Arbitration Centre. The claim was reduced to USD644,536.32 (RM2.9 mil).

4. Breaching the non-competitive clause of Article 15 of RERA and Section 27 of the Franchise Act 1988

Forbidden to Engage in Competition:
Forbidden during the term of the Agreement. Unless otherwise consented by the Parties in advance and in writing, during the term of this Agreement, either Party including their managers, employees, shareholders, subsidiaries, or parent companies shall not, in the Territory directly or indirectly, by itself or through agents, engage in any commercial activities that are identical or similar to those done in the Franchised Stores.

5. Franchised Stores


According to Section 27 of the Franchise Act 1988:

A franchisee shall give a written guarantee to a franchisor that the franchisee, including its directors, the spouses and immediately family of the directors, and his employees shall not carry on any other business similar to the franchised business operated by the franchisee during the franchise term and for 2 years after the expiration or earlier termination of the franchise agreement.

La Kaffa and their injuction against Loob Holding

The injuction is dated 22nd February 2017 and seeks to stop Loob Holding from carrying out a similar business and to stop them from disclosing or converting Chatime’s proprietary information. 
We reached out to Lai Chee Hoe, a lawyer who advises F&B brands and who is also the founder and CEO of Burgielaw.com and asked him what are La Kaffa’s options against Loob Holdings and the entity Tealive:

“It’s not easy to argue against the non-competition clause because Tealive appears to be in a similar business segment.”

We also wanted to know Loob Holding’s chances against the injunction to which we asked lawyer Louis Liaw, a general litigator from Ramrais and Partners:

"Firstly, La Kaffa has to prove number one, that this is a serious issue that needs to be tried. They have to prove that they have to go to court. Secondly, they have to prove that damages to La Kaffa's business cannot be compensated by money. Finally, the court will consider the balance of convenience. This means they will consider if it is easier to stop Tealive or let them continue. For example, the courts may consider the loss of jobs for the Tealive employees as a factor to the case and let Tealive continue." 

"It is pretty much 50/50 up to the courts at this time which is in terms of where the balance of convenience lies."

The Truth

Well now you actually have the full story. The law is never so black and white and circumstances are not always what they seem. Also, if you're interested, Tealive may have allegedly ripped off their new mission statement from local boys Mutha Puaka. They contend that their slogan "NEVER BULLY THE WEAK, NEVER FEAR THE STRONG" was ripped straight from them. 
The research regarding La Kaffa's letters to Loob Holding was done entirely by BurgieLaw.com and was reproduced with permission. We asked them why the story was taken down and were told that they were directed by management to remove the post. That said, an archived version of the story can be found here*winky face*.  









Bubble Tea War (CHATIME v TEALIVE): La Kaffa’s version

So now you have heard Bryan Loo’s story. What about La Kaffa’s?
Since nothing was heard from them, we decided to do some investigative works and voila! We discovered an injunction was filed by La Kaffa in the Malaysian courts this week. We also subsequently discovered that there was an earlier dispute which has resulted in an arbitration matter filed in the Singapore International Arbitration Centre by La Kaffa.
As for the local suit, it was registered as Kuala Lumpur Originating Summons No. WA-24IP-3-02/2017 and an ad interim injunction was heard before the High Court Judge, Justice Wong Kian Kheong (who was the lawyer in Tun Dr Ling’s PKFZ case and also Abdul Razak’ lawyers in the Altantuya’s trial where Abdul Razak Baginda admitted to having an affair with Altantuya.)
No this is no conspiracy theory and let us not digress.
Coming back to the bubble tea war. We were made to understand that the Judge has directed Loob Holding to file an affidavit in reply to the allegations made against them but the High Court Judge did not allow a temporary injunction whilst parties exchange affidavits.
As of today, an affidavit in reply has yet to be filed.  But in the interest of time we thought however the F&B community now must be anxious of what was the story behind so we combed through the documents filed in court in particular the affidavit and we found explosive allegations which include documentary and video evidences of alleged breaches.
In fact, the affidavit also goes to show that La Kaffa was accumulating evidence discreetly to an extent capturing extracts of the interview Bryan Loo gave to BFM recently.
Before we begin, let us look at the OS filed by LA Kaffa. In essence, La Kaffa has filed an injunction to:
  • restrain Loob Holding and all his konco-konco (including its directors, spouses and immediately faily of its directors, and employees, whether directly or indirectly itself or themselves or through agents) from carrying on, procuring, causing, enabling, authorising and/or permitting any other business identical or similar to the “CHATIME” franchised business; and
  • restrain Loob Holding and all his konco-konco as mentioned above to disclose and/or use confidential information of La Kaffa, including the operating mode, franchised concept, technologies, formulations, ingridients, programs and designs.
This is in light of the new found brand “Tealive” introduced by Loob.
So what were the grounds La Kaffa relied on and what are the actual allegations all about?

1. Loob Holding bought raw materials from 3rd party

According to the affidavit, it all started around January 2016 where LA Kaffa suspected something amiss when the order to the raw materials dropped despite an increase of revenue. The allegations were specific referring to milk tea powder, cocoa powder and polypropylene (PP) cups.
When there was no plausible explanation given by Loob, LA Kaffa decided to initiate its own investigation. They sent undercover representatives to various outlets in Malaysia and took evidence.  In the course of doing that, they have video evidence showing the outlets were using an alleged CHATIME beverage cup which they labelled it as “fake CHATIME cup”.
The affidavit states that the authentic CHATIME cups should contain either “YM-500” or “YM-700” markings on the base of the cups and these markings are material confirming authenticity sourced through SCPP Ind Co Ltd.
LA KAFFA has then also sent various letters notifying such breach and the letters can be seen below:
Letter dated 12th May 2016

Letter dated 2nd August 2016


Letter dated 3rd August 2016


In the letter dated 20.9.2016, La Kaffa alleged that the sourcing of materials from 3rd party was made within the knowledge of Loob since they replied to La Kaffa and did not deny sourcing it from third party citing reasons “ it was inevitable that some of the key components will require local source from the readily available market in light of the competitive business environment.”

La Kaffa alleged that the breach contravenes Article 7 of RERA and we enclose the actual clause below:

2. Request to inspect books were denied

Since there was no convincing reason given by Loob, La Kaffa then wanted to exercised its rights to inspect and audit the books of Loob under Article 10(iv) of the Regional Exclusive Representation Agreement. (“RERA”)
However this was similarly delayed and rejected.

3. There is an outstanding royalty due and owing by Loob Holding

Under the RERA, Loob was obliged to make full payment of the purchase of raw materials. From the papers we sighted, the outstanding sum was USD713,273.72 which was also the subject matter of the arbitration filed by La Kaffa in the Singapore International Arbitration Centre. The outstanding amount claimed was then reduced to USD644,536.32.

4. Non-competition

La Kaffa is also concerned with the use of its proprietary information being used by Loob to carry on its new business especially Bryan has openly announced that all 165 outlets will be converted to Tealive which is essentially running a similar business.
La Kaffa in essence relies on:

Section 27 of the Franchise Act 1988 which provides:

S.27 Prohibition against similar business
  • A franchisee shall give a written guarantee to a franchisor that the franchisee, including its directors, the spouses and immediately family of the directors, and his employees shall not carry on any other business similar to the franchised business operated by the franchisee during the franchise term and for 2 years after the expiration or earlier termination of the franchise agreement
  • The franchisee, including its directors, the spouses and immediate family of the directors, and his employees shall comply with the terms of the written guarantee given under Subsection (1)
  • A person who fails to comply with subsection (1) or (2) commits an offence.
It is also interesting that Article 15 of the RERA has similar provision and we have extracted it below for your convenience.
La Kaffa also alleged that it has provided various manuals and operation training manual of which these proprietary information is unique which La Kaffa has expended a vast amount of money and effort in developing it. Now that since RERA is terminated, Loob should not be using the confidential and proprietary information procured from La Kaffa.
This was corroborated by the fact that Bryan has in interview claimed that “the same team, the same people, both employees and partners, in place at the same outlets,….” Which La Kaffa finds it commercially improbable.

The 'Fatty' Chinese Zodiac Forecast in 2024 (Iverson Lee)

Interesting topic for 2024 years that you have on your bazi chart that you have it you will be surprised that you will become the fatty anim...